Details about our Infringement Search

An infringement search, also known as a clearance search, or freedom to operate search, are conducted mainly for two purposes:

  • To establish whether a product or process infringes an unexpired patent in the country where it is planned to be commercialized
  • To verify whether the patent holders can make, use, or market their innovation with no risk of infringing another holder’s unexpired patent

One major difference between an infringement search and a freedom to operate search is that with the former expired prior art data is not relevant. This is because the search is conducted only to prove that the invention that is under consideration does not fall within the range of an UNEXPIRED patent.

Another reason for conducting an infringement search is to underwrite a licensee of a patent. When you get a license to use another’s patent to manufacture, use or sell a product, it is vital that the patentee include, in the license agreement, a warranty of non-infringement in the license agreement.

An infringement search, just like a patentability search, is a necessary part of the Due Diligence Process. Prior to giving the go-ahead signal, investors will probably want to ensure that a clearance/infringement search was done at the start of the project.

Generally, a particular patent claim can be rendered invalid due to the existence of some kind of Prior art, like a publication or a presentation, about the matter claimed in the patent, that the patent examination process missed. In fact, a patent can be challenged in some countries just because an inventor wasn't correctly named.

If your contemplated actions infringe upon valid intellectual property rights that belong to others, you have the option to obtain freedom to operate with regard to any one of those rights by negotiating for a license with the owner of the original IP rights.

Our infringement searches help our clients gauge whether or not they can liberally operate without infringing upon a competitor’s patent. We cover only the claims of valid, in-force patents searches, to see if the particular product is part of them.

Our infringement search covers the following:

  • Infringement by Utilization Search
  • Infringement Liability Search

With our services, you are assured of:

  • Search of valid, unexpired patents within a market.
  • Patent reference including relevancy analysis, with exact citations.
  • No date restrictions.
  • Subject matter experts in several branches of technology, including: Polymer Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Technology, Chemistry, Bio-Technology, Genetics, and Computer Science. Additionally our experts have access to the industry’s leading patent, trademark and prior art databases such as Delphion, LexisNexis, MicroPat, and STN. Our domain includes subjects like Polymer Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Technology, Chemistry, Bio-Technology, Genetics and Computer Science.

Details about our Infringement Analysis

Our patent infringement and analysis team are technologists with intellectual property training. We allow law firms, practicing and non-practicing entities to quickly assess the value of their portfolio, identify possible licensing opportunities (or infringers), develop market and damages size potential and build the analysis required. From Rule 11 Analysis or Preliminary Infringement Contentions (PICs) to detailed discovery requests, we allow our clients to scale effectively and efficiently. Our extensive experience in performing patent searches allows us to deliver insightful results within our technology areas.

 

Astrazeneca AB V. KapposExpress Card Systems LLC v. ShutterflyFido's Fences v. Radio Systems CorporationKeurig Incorporated v. Sturm FoodsMain Hastings LLC v. The Boeing CompanyMicrosoft Corporation v. MotorolaNDW Patent Innovations LLC v. Diversified RepackagingNDW Patent Innovations LLC v. Uniden America CorporationPatcap LLC v. Pioneer Photo AlbumsRound Rock Research LLC v. HTC CorporationSymantec Corporation v. Uniloc USATessera v. Sony ElectronicsTeva Neuroscience V.Watson PharmaVendio Services v. P.S. ProductsVital Pharmaceuticals v. HinzKim Edward Laube v. FURminatorPercision Medical V.Genstar TechnologiesPromote Innovation LLC v. Bar's ProductsPromote Innovation LLC v. WD-40 CompanyB-50.com LLC v. InfoSync Services, LLCCaldera Pharmaceuticals v. Los Alamos National Security, L.L.C.Data Network Storage LLC v. Cisco SystemsEli Lilly and Comapny V. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories,LtdHoeptner v. Mapa Manufacturing LLCImaginal Systematic LLC v. Leggett & PlattJIA Jewelry Importers of America v. Pandora Jewelry, LLCModumetal v. Integran TechnologiesNational Institute for Strategic Technology Acquisition and Commercialization (NISTAC) v. Nissan North AmericaNusser v. Asus Computer InternationalWI-LAN v. Alcatel-Lucent USAAllergan v. Paddock Laboratories.Allergan v. Watson Pharmaceuticals.Asher v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation.National Wastewater Systems v. Smith.NuVasive v. Globus MedicalRTC Industries v. Marketing Impact LimitedSALtech Corporation v. CH2M HillTeva Neuroscience v. Mylan PharmaceuticalsWebvention LLC v. Adidas AmericaWI-LAN v. Alcatel-Lucent USABetter Education v. Turning Technologies, LLCBlenheim Group LLC V. Clark Recreation LtdCeres Communications Technologies, LLC v. 8x8DFD Technology LLC v. Native Instruments North AmericaKuruvilla V.Southeastern pennsylvania Transporation AuthorityLeh Chu Enterprise Co Ltd v. Sona Somerset, LLCMikityanskiy v. Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products N.A.Mikityanskiy v. Sears Roebuck and Co.Motorola Mobility v. ApplePfizer v. Lupin LtdPromote Innovation LLC v. Prym Consumer USASouthern Imperial v. Retail Display Components, LtdTex Pat, LLC v. AlcoaTex Pat, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.Bradford v. Nike GolfDatatern v. Eli Lilly and CompanyEnpat v. BauerGeorge v. Collective BrandsHollister Incorporated v. C.R. BardHollister Incorporated v. ConvaTecMammel v. HoagSipco, LLC v. EnergateC2 Options Exchange, Incorporated v. International Securities Exchange, LLCEMG Technology, LLC v. Dr. Pepper Snapple GroupKartwheels USA, v. TrolleyBasket North America LLCMain Hastings, LLC v. Buy.comKrinner Innovation GmbH et al v. Qingdao WangBaoqiang Industry, Co., LtdMain Hastings, LLC v. J&M Manufacturing CompanyMain Hastings, LLC v. Scientific SpecialtiesMain Hastings, LLC v. Yomega Corp.Patent Group, LLC v. GlockPromote Innovation LLC v. Electrolux Home ProductsPurdue Pharmaceutical Products L.PRW Distributing, Inc v. Waterfall Pond Supply of Washington.Texas Data Co., L.L.C. v. MedelaTexas Data Co., L.L.C. v. PodeeTexas Data Co., L.L.C. v. The Evercare CompanyTexas Data Co., L.L.C. v. The Procter & Gamble Companyv. Enpat, Inc Patent Group, LLC v. FluidmasterPatent Group, LLC v. Freeland IndustriesPatent Group, LLC v. Hyde ToolsPatent Group, LLC v. Watertite ProductsPatent Group, LLC v. Yeoman & CompanyPromote Innovation LLC v. Home Depot U.S.A.Marvell International Ltd. v. Link A Media Devices Corp.Alberts V. KapposFenner Investments Ltd v. Juniper NetworksLochner Technologies, LLC v. LenovoLyden v. Adidas AmericaMain Hastings, LLC v. Kimberly Clark-WorldwideResponsive Innovations, LLC v. Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLCSkis Rossignol S.A.S. v. Armada SkisSpedire Technology LLC v. FedEx CorporationTNW Firearms v. Tactical ManufacturingCollections Marketing Center, v. Apollo Enterprise SolutionsLife Technologies Corporation v. EbiosciencePopNoggins, LLC v. PicFlips, LLCRecticel Automobilesysteme GmbH v. Automotive Components Holdings, LLCConectflex Technologies LLC v. R & D CircuitsCSR plc v. Broadcom CorporationIvera Medical Corporation v. HospiraMain Hastings, LLC v. Helen of Troy, LtdSecurity Chain Company v. Quality Chain CorporationUpsite Technologies Inc v. SealezeVan Romer v. Argonaut Inflatable Research and EngineeringAMX, LLC v. Legrand Home SystemsInteractive Fitness Holdings, LLC v. Icon Health & FitnessRandstad Holding N. V. v. Webvention Holdings LLCWarner Chilcott Company, LLC v. MylanDespatch Industries Limited Partnership v. TP SolarFiskars Brands v. Spectrum Brandsv. Fameccanica Data SpAGS CleanTech Corporation v. Flottweg Separation TechnologiesLaserlock Technologies V.WS Packaging GroupSiler-Khodr v. Bachem BioscienceTriMas Corporation v. Webvention Holdings LLCAmericans For Fair Patent Use, LLC v. The Orvis CompanyAutoForm Engineering GmbH v. Engineering Technology AssociatesBird Brain v. Carson IndustriesEagles Nest OutfittersGalderma Laboratories LP v. Actavis Mid Atlantic LLCGenzyme Corporation v. Medicis Pharmaceutical CorporationHon Hai Precision Industry Company, Ltd. v. Suyin Co. LtdInstinet Incorporated v. Webvention Holdings LLCMain Hastings, LLC v. International Medical IndustriesMain Hastings, LLC v. Sears Holdings CorporationNTP v. YahooPandora Jewelry, LLC v. Morellato & Sector USAPatent Group, LLC v. Academy, LtdPatent Group, LLC v. Eezer ProductsPatent Group, LLC v. Eklind Tool CoPivot Point, Inc v. GorillaWine Master Cellars, LLLP v. DrobotWMS Gaming Inc v. Bally GamingAFTG-TG LLC v. Feature Integration TechnologyAFTG-TG LLC v. Nuvoton Technology CorporationAFTG-TG, LLC v. Winbond Electronics CorporationDDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, LPLogistick v. NorsemanM.K. Distributors v. ETS ExpressMylan Pharmaceuticals v. Galderma LaboratoriesCold Spring Granite Company v. Matthews International CorporationEli Lilly and Company V.Accord HealthcarePromote Innovation LLC v. Aero Products InternationalRapha Products Group, LLC v. SkullcandySandoz V. Boehringer IngelheimUnique Lighting Systems v. Landscape Lighting WorldDawn Equipment Company v. Lofquist WeldingDonaldson Company v. Clark FilterDonaldson Company v. Group FourGenerac Power Systems v Kohler Co.Intellect Wireless v. Sharp CorporationNorell V. SP IndustriesRally Manufacturing v. Federal-Mogul CorporationTQP Development, LLC v. DellBiogaia ABEverglades Interactive LLC v. PlaydomFlambeau v. Razor USA LLCLandmark Technology LLC v. BJ's Wholesale ClubMain Hastings, LLC v. Costco Wholesale CorporationMcDonald v. Premier Pet Products, LLCThe Union Frozen Products Company Limited v. Eastern Fish CompanyTransData, Inc. v. Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric LLCCPI Card Group-Colorado, Inc. v. Leighton Technologies, LLCEON Corp. IP Holdings, LLCGemalto S.A. v. HTC CorporationMetso Minerals Industries v. Astec IndustriesPrucher v. CMW InternationalAbbott Laboratories v. Anchen PharmaceuticalsFasteners for Retail v. American Gasket TechnologiesJason International v. American Acrylic & InjectionMain Hastings LLC v. MunchkinMega Wall Corporation v. Omaha Fixture ManufacturingNetwork Signatures v. Comerica IncorporatedNetwork Signatures v. ScottradePromote Innovation LLC v. Signature Brands,LLCTurek v. McNeil-PPCAstraZeneca UK Limited v. Watson PharmaceuticalsBlenheim Group,LLC V.International Innovation Company USAClip Ventures LLC v. Suncast CorporationInnovative Global Systems LLC v. OnStar, LLCLear Corporation v. TS Tech USA CorporationMain Hastings LLC v. Commscope, Inc.Noah System V. IntuitNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Apotex Corp.Orexo Ab V.Edict Pharmaceuticals PVT.LTD.Polaris Industries Inc.v.CFMOTO Powersports, Inc.Promote Innovation LLC v. MotorolaSanomedics Development Corporation v.American Scientific Resources,IncorporatedSuomen Colorize Oy v. Dish Network L.L.CSupermarket Energy Technologies LLC v.Supermarket Energy Solutions IncorporatedMain Hastings, LLC v. Cardinal HealthMain Hastings, LLC v. Deere & Co.Main Hastings, LLC v. Hewlett Packard CompanyAstellas US LLC V. Nycomed U.S.Main Hastings, LLC v. StaplesNational Pasteurized Eggs v. Michael FoodsNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Apotex Corp.Promote Innovation LLC v. HMS Mfg. Co.Promote Innovation LLC v. Lemada Light Industries Ltd.Raymarine Inc v. American GNC Corp.Romary Associates v. Kibbi LLCSample Digital Holdings LLC v. PIX Systems,LLCSan Francisco Technology v.G.T. Water ProductsZydus Pharamaceuticals USA V. Eli Lilly and CompanyArrivalStar S.A. v. DSV Air & SeaBroadcom Corporation v. CSR plcCruiser Accessories, LLC v. Bell Automotive ProductsCruiser Accessories, LLC v. Custom AccessoriesGeneral Protecht Group, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.Gharb V. Unitronics 1989 R G LTDGharb V.City of HobokenHill v. BrownHoffman-LA Roche V. DR.Reddys Laboratories,LTDMain Hastings, LLC v. FedEx CorporationPosi-Trak, Inc v. UCSRoscoes Electronics and Nanotechnology LLC v. Chip McCormick Custom LLCApple, Inc. v. MotorolaEli Lilly and Company V.Teva parenteral MedicinesFaresenius Medical Care HoldingsForecast Sales V.Axxiom ManufacturingGelTight Enterprises, LLC v. RespironicsIron Bridge Tools, Inc. v. Olympia Tools InternationalJ. Schmalz GmbH v. Coval Vacuum TechnologyMain Hastings LLC v. Carolina Publishing and Advertising Corp.Network Signatures v. Glaxosmithkline LLCNetwork Signatures v. PepsicoNetwork Signatures v. PfizerOakley v. Elvex CorporationOpen Innovation LLC v. Char-BroilPatent Group, LLC v. Worden Safety ProductsPFizer v. ActavisSansay, Inc v. Rates TechnologySmartPhone Technologies LLC v. HTC CorporationVentronics Systems, LLC v. Drager Medical GmbHVirginia E-Commerce Solutions, LLC v. eBay, Inc.Zenith Electronics LLC v. Sony CorporationTex Pat, LLC v. United Technologies CorporationTex Pat, LLC v. Sharp Corporation
   
   
Request More Information






CAPTCHA code image

      

intellectual property services, legal support services, legal advantage, legal advantage llc, legal advantage law service, patent search, inventor resources, patent services, copyright, trademark design, patent illustration, patent drawing, patent design, prior art search, language translation, document review attorney, trial graphics, legal research, patent analysis, patent mapping, electronic discovery, mortgage modification, biotechnology, staffing, spend analysis services
Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, New York, Ottawa, San Francisco, Washington DC